Conflict Free Rule for Combining Evidences

نویسنده

  • Frédéric Dambreville
چکیده

Recent works have investigated the problem of the conflict redistribution in the fusion rules of evidence theories. As a consequence of these works, many new rules have been proposed. Now, there is not a clear theoretical criterion for a choice of a rule instead another. The present chapter proposes a new theoretically grounded rule, based on a new concept of sensor independence. This new rule avoids the conflict redistribution, by an adaptive combination of the beliefs. Both the logical grounds and the algorithmic implementation are considered.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An Improved Dempster-Shafer Algorithm Using a Partial Conflict Measurement

Multiple evidences based decision making is an important functionality for computers and robots. To combine multiple evidences, mathematical theory of evidence has been developed, and it involves the most vital part called Dempster’s rule of combination. The rule is used for combining multiple evidences. However, the combined result gives a counterintuitive conclusion when highly conflicting ev...

متن کامل

About Relation between the Measure of Conflict and Decreasing of Ignorance in Theory of Evidence

There is a problem of applying of combining rules to evidence which were got from different information sources in framework of Dempster-Shafer theory. In this work the conflict measure and index of decreasing of ignorance in frame of Dempster-Shafer theory are introduced for characterization of quality of applied combining rules. Those functionals are analyzed on the bodies of evidences of spe...

متن کامل

Developing a monitoring system for long-distance pipeline leakage incorporating fusion of conflicting evidences

Quite often, during long-distance pipe leakage, critical decisions have to be made quickly and with as much certainty as possible using conflicting and uncertain sources of information. Key to providing quality decision options is an appropriate method of combining, or fusing, these heterogeneous evidence sources. Since the development of belief function theory introduced by Shafer in the 1970s...

متن کامل

A New Similarity Measure for Combining Conflicting Evidences

In Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory, multiple information from the distinct information sources are combined to obtain a single Basic Probability Assignment (BPA) function. The well-known combination rule of Dempster-Shafer (DS) provides the weaker solution to the management of conflicting information at the normalization stage. Even this rule fails and provide the counter intuitive results while co...

متن کامل

An Extended Approach for Dempster-Shafer Theory

The modeling of epistemic knowledge is a necessity of most systems dealing with some sort of artificial reasoning. There a re several formalisms able to mathematically model someone’s degrees of belief. A very popular one is the Bayesian Theory, which is based on a prior knowledge of a probability distribution. Another model is the Theory of Evidence, or DempskrShafer Theory, which provides a m...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/math/0608116  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006